Answers

Yes, provided the district shows builders buying older houses, which is the test the whole buying map is built on. Rank decides which address carries your guide; it plays no part in whether a purchase is possible, because demand is read street by street.

The same evidence as anywhere else in the programme, handled more carefully: achieved prices for new houses on comparable ground, building outlay, carrying expense and a builder margin. Where a small market record is thin, the guide and the team both say so instead of dressing a guess up as a finding.

The working range is the same as the rest of the programme: inside one to three weeks where title is clean and speed matters, or on a later date of your choosing where it does not. The timetable is agreed before contracts, not discovered after them.

No. Houses are bought in the condition they stand in, belongings included where clearing them would be a burden, which is one reason families settling an estate from a distance use this route for the final two hundred cities as much as anywhere.

The firm takes no commission, because it is the buyer rather than an agent, and it levies no seller side completion charges. State or local taxes that your own state places on a seller still apply under your state rules, and your city guide names them.

The firm completes the purchase with you first. Only after that does the property pass to a builder from the checked network, so during your sale there is exactly one counterparty, one figure and one date to keep track of.

A tenancy is not a bar to a sale here. Builders plan around occupation more calmly than most family buyers, and sharing the rent level and the agreement dates early lets the figure take the tenancy properly into account.

Then the guide for your city still earns its keep, because it sets out what marketing the house there costs and how long it is taking. Owners are free to take that route instead, and a figure requested here creates no obligation to refuse it.